9to5mac default 1
Gadgets & Devices

iOS 18 RC Confirms Apple Is Testing Heart-Rate Sensors in AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro for 2025 Health Features

A close reading of iOS 18 RC signals that Apple may be embedding heart-rate sensing capabilities in its next-generation wireless earbuds, with the AirPods Pro 3 and the Powerbeats Pro poised to carry new health features. The discovered code references a heart-rate sensor and a workflow that integrates workout tracking with Apple Health, suggesting that Apple intends to deepen health-tracking across its true wireless lineup. The timing remains uncertain, but the signals point toward a broader rollout of health-oriented sensors in 2025, accompanied by revised designs and new chips designed to enable these features. As with any such disclosures, these findings hinge on beta software references and rumors that have circulated across industry sources in recent weeks.

Evidence from iOS 18 RC: health sensor hints and setup workflows

In the latest iOS 18 release candidate, a set of strings has surfaced that appears to describe how users might interact with wireless earbuds equipped with a heart-rate sensor. One line describes wearing both earbuds during workouts to monitor heart rate and to send that data to Apple Health, with an instruction to manage the sensor via Bluetooth settings. The line is notable not only for confirming a potential heart-rate sensing capability but also for outlining a user-facing control path: the heart-rate data would be accessible to the Health app, and users would manage the feature through the Bluetooth configuration interface on their devices. This fragment is presented as part of a system component that oversees the setup and pairing of Apple’s wireless headphones, including AirPods and Beats products, indicating that the implementation would be tightly integrated with iPhone and iPad operating system services.

What makes this discovery significant is not merely the presence of a heart-rate sensor claim, but the context in which the line appears. It sits within a broader set of system components tasked with onboarding and configuring wireless audio devices, implying that Apple intends to normalize health-sensor onboarding to be as seamless as initial Bluetooth pairing. The discovery aligns with long-standing industry expectations that Apple would extend health-tracking capabilities beyond its watches and fitness bands into its audio peripherals. While this is the only explicit string found in the current beta, the implications are that Apple is preparing a more health-centric user experience across its audio accessories, integrating real-time biometric data into the Health ecosystem.

From a product and user-experience perspective, this situates heart-rate monitoring not as a standalone feature but as a component of a broader workout analytics workflow. The potential workflow would allow athletes and casual exercisers to leverage their earbuds as a secondary sensor, complementing wrist-based monitors and other devices in the Apple Health network. The integration would likely involve data synchronization, storage, and visualization within Health, along with privacy controls and clear user consent mechanisms. If these findings prove accurate, they would reflect a strategic move by Apple to broaden the health data stream that flows into HealthKit, potentially enabling new coaching, training, and wellness applications that rely on heart-rate information collected in real time during physical activity.

In addition to the signal about heart-rate tracking, the beta code suggests that the feature would be configurable through standard settings rather than requiring a dedicated app or complex setup process. This interpretation would be consistent with Apple’s philosophy of minimizing friction for health features—making it easier for users to enable, customize, and manage biometric tracking from their earbuds. The combination of presence in the system-level setup flow and direct Health integration would likely help ensure consistent data quality and reliability, given the precise calibration and data routing that Apple historically affords its Health ecosystem.

The broader implication is that Apple’s next-gen earbuds may offer a richer, more integrated health-tracking experience than current models, potentially rivaling some built-in or wearable sensors in dedicated fitness devices. If the Health data path is robust enough, users could receive actionable insights tied to workouts, recovery, and overall fitness progression, all powered by the heart-rate sensors embedded in wireless earbuds. The beta hints do not reveal all details—such as sampling rate, sampling windows, or even whether the data would include heart-rate variability or other derived metrics—but they do indicate a clear intent to bring biometric sensing into the earbud experience in a manner that is central to the OS-level health and fitness framework.

As with any beta-era discovery, the exact scope of implementation remains contingent on subsequent testing and eventual official confirmation. However, the presence of a heart-rate related string in iOS 18 RC strengthens the expectation that Apple plans to launch at least one new health sensor across its next generation of wireless audio devices. It also raises reasonable questions about compatibility with existing Health features, the degree of cross-device data fusion, and how developers might leverage the sensor in third-party apps. In short, this iOS 18 RC finding provides a concrete signal that health-sensing is moving from the watch and wearable realm into the earbud family, signaling a broader, platform-wide strategy to integrate biometric data into daily activity tracking.

Health sensor capabilities and privacy controls: data flow, consent, and user choices

The heart-rate sensor in future AirPods models would ideally operate as part of a secure data channel, transmitting biometric metrics to Apple Health while conforming to Apple’s rigorous privacy and data governance standards. The foundational idea is that heart-rate measurements obtained via the earbuds would be captured during workouts, with the resulting data synchronized to Health for long-term storage, trend analysis, and potential alerts. Such data could feed into activity rings, fitness goals, and personalized coaching features that increasingly rely on biometric signals to assess intensity, effort, and recovery timelines.

A crucial feature highlighted by the beta’s text is user autonomy: the ability to turn off the heart-rate sensor for privacy. This option would be essential, given the sensitivity of biometric data and the broad adoption of health-tracking features in consumer electronics. A straightforward privacy toggle in the Bluetooth settings or a dedicated Health/privacy section within iOS would empower users to disable the sensor when privacy is a priority, such as in social settings or sensitive environments. The presence of a privacy switch would also help address potential concerns about continuous monitoring or passive data collection, ensuring that health-data collection remains opt-in and easily reversible.

From a usability standpoint, integrating such controls in familiar Bluetooth settings would lower friction, making it simpler for users to decide when and how their heart-rate data is gathered. This approach mirrors Apple’s general approach to health privacy, which emphasizes explicit consent, transparent data flows, and clear indicators when data collection is active. If the feature ships, a well-designed user interface would likely include real-time indicators that show when heart-rate monitoring is active, a quick way to pause or disable data capture during workouts or non-workout periods, and straightforward methods to review or delete collected data within Health.

The privacy considerations extend beyond immediate user control. Apple would need to address questions about third-party access to heart-rate data obtained from earbud sensors, how long data is stored, whether it’s aggregated or de-identified for certain uses, and how it interacts with other Apple devices that may access Health data. Given Apple’s emphasis on privacy across its ecosystem, it is likely that any implementation would include robust on-device processing wherever possible, secure data transfer, and explicit consent prompts for data sharing with third-party apps. The anticipated privacy framework would be designed to reassure users that sensitive biometric information is subject to the same high standards that govern HealthKit, with clear data retention policies and user-centric controls.

In practice, the user experience would aim to deliver a seamless integration of biometric data into workouts and daily health monitoring without overloading the user with complexity. The sensor would operate only during specified activities or when enabled by the user, and it would tie into Health metrics used by native apps and approved third-party solutions. To ensure trust, Apple would likely publish detailed privacy disclosures and provide straightforward methods to review, export, or delete heart-rate data associated with earbud use. In addition, there would be likely platform-level safeguards to prevent unintended data collection, for example by curating which apps can access health data derived from earbud sensors and under what circumstances. The anticipated outcome is a balanced design that offers valuable health insights while preserving user privacy and control.

The practical implications for athletes and everyday users would be meaningful. Heart-rate data from earbuds could complement wrist-worn measurements, particularly during certain workouts where wrist-based sensors might be less reliable or comfortable. For users with sensitive privacy preferences, the availability of a simple off switch would provide peace of mind. The net effect would be a more comprehensive health data set within Apple’s Health ecosystem, with earbud-derived heart-rate metrics augmenting existing workout tracking and wellness features. If implemented well, this capability could become a standard expectation for premium wireless headphones in Apple’s lineup, pushing competitors to offer similarly integrated health-savvy devices.

AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2: health sensors, design, and chip considerations

The rumor mill consistently points to AirPods Pro 3 as a centerpiece of Apple’s health-hardware ambitions, with the new generation expected to include a redesigned chassis and a chip capable of running the health features introduced by the sensors. The proposed design refresh would not only accommodate any new sensor hardware but also align with Apple’s broader strategy of delivering refined form factors that emphasize both aesthetics and performance. The new chip would be necessary to support real-time processing and secure data handling for the health sensors, ensuring accurate readings, efficient power management, and robust connectivity with iOS devices and HealthKit.

Beyond AirPods Pro 3, insiders have indicated that Apple plans to extend the same heart-rate sensor to the next generation of Powerbeats Pro. The Powerbeats Pro 2 is rumored to arrive in 2025, with initial visuals suggesting a new design language for Beats’ wireless earbuds. The prospect of a shared health-sensing capability across both AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2 would reflect an integrated product strategy, enabling health-focused features to work across Apple’s mainstream earbuds and Beats’ fitness-oriented lineup. While the visible exterior changes in early design previews hint at a refreshed silhouette, the crucial implication lies in enabling health-tracking features that would be compatible with Apple Health and other health-oriented services within the ecosystem.

One key note concerns user privacy controls in this health-forward scenario. The ability to deactivate the heart-rate sensor would apply across both AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2, ensuring that users who prefer not to have biometric data collected can opt out without sacrificing other functionalities. This interoperability across product families would contribute to a cohesive user experience—where health data captured by earbuds is accessible through Health, while allowing users to manage whether that data is recorded at all. Given the potential breadth of these devices’ health features, Apple would likely emphasize consistent design patterns for enabling, configuring, and deactivating the health sensor across AirPods and Beats products, to reduce confusion and improve user trust.

In the context of the broader market, the introduction of a heart-rate sensor into the AirPod line would be a notable milestone for wearable health tech. It would push competitors to consider integrating biometric sensors into their own wireless earbud ecosystems and could influence how exercise data is collected and analyzed across the industry. The combination of a new design, a dedicated health-oriented chip, and shared health-sensor capabilities across AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2 would indicate a multi-pronged approach by Apple to extend its Health ecosystem deeper into personal audio devices, potentially enabling more granular fitness analytics, more precise workout guidance, and richer longitudinal health insights for users.

From a user experience standpoint, the health sensor integration must be nearly invisible in routine use, providing reliable data during workouts without imposing burdens on battery life or comfort. Apple would need to optimize power management to ensure heart-rate sensing does not significantly drain earbuds’ battery, especially during endurance activities. The sensor hardware would also need to maintain accuracy across a range of conditions, including varying ear sizes, movement, and ambient temperature. Finally, a clear, intuitive user interface would be essential to help users enable the feature, customize privacy settings, and interpret the resulting health data within Health. Taken together, these considerations highlight the complexity and importance of hardware, software, and user experience alignment in delivering successful health-sensing earbuds.

Launch timeline and 2025 outlook: what to expect and what remains uncertain

Chronology around Apple’s health-focused earbud strategy remains a matter of cautious speculation, but several consistent threads emerge from the current conversation. The most prominent is that AirPods Pro 3 and the next generation Powerbeats Pro are poised for a health-sensor-enabled future, with 2025 positioned as the target window for public unveilings. The rationale behind this timeline rests on multiple signals: the cadence of Apple’s product cycles, the typical cycle for major iOS updates, and the observed pace at which new sensor-enabled features tend to reach production. The interplay between iPhone software updates and accessory firmware upgrades is central to ensuring seamless performance; thus, a 2025 debut date would allow Apple to optimize its Health experience across devices while aligning with software and chip-level readiness.

It is also possible that Powerbeats Pro 2 would be introduced ahead of the AirPods Pro 3 or that Apple would attempt a simultaneous reveal of both products in a single event next year. The industry has observed that Apple frequently coordinates launches to reinforce the ecosystem’s cohesion and maximize impact across product families. However, delays or shifts in the development timeline could push either device into late 2025 or even early 2026, depending on manufacturing challenges, regulatory considerations, and the success of the health-sensor prototypes in real-world testing. The lack of definitive confirmation means that both timing and sequencing remain uncertain, and potential delays could affect fan expectations and developer readiness for HealthKit integration.

The 2025 window also aligns with broader industry expectations that Apple will continue to invest heavily in health-centric wearables. If the AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2 indeed carry heart-rate sensing capabilities, we would expect further enhancements to the Health ecosystem, including more precise data synchronization, expanded metrics such as heart-rate variability, and deeper integration with workout apps and coaching services. Apple’s strategy could also influence how third-party fitness platforms approach health data interoperability, as developers look to leverage earbud-derived metrics in their analytics tools. The exact feature set and data granularity will depend on device form factor constraints, battery considerations, and privacy regulations, all of which will be addressed as the products move from concept and testing toward production.

Another dimension of the timeline concerns the AirPods 4 event, which recently introduced two new AirPods configurations, one featuring active noise cancellation. While this event signaled ongoing refresh cycles for Apple’s earbud lineup, insiders suggest that updates specifically for the AirPods Pro line were not expected in the near term, with 2025 identified as the likely period for significant Pro-level changes. In this context, the AirPods 4 event sets a strategic stage: it demonstrates Apple’s continued expansion of the earbud family and the company’s willingness to diversify its audio offerings, while maintaining a longer lead time for the Pro-focused health features that would accompany the AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2.

Given these considerations, analysts and enthusiasts should prepare for a multi-stage rollout rather than a single, blockbuster launch. Apple could begin with a discreet software-enabled health-sensor beta for select users or devices, followed by broader rollouts, hardware revisions, and developer engagement programs designed to maximize HealthKit and fitness-app compatibility. The possibility of early previews at developer conferences or private briefings exists, but official confirmation will likely await Apple’s formal product announcements and demo demonstrations. In the absence of an official announcement, observers should approach these forecasts as informed expectations rather than guaranteed outcomes, recognizing that Apple’s product roadmaps are subject to change as development progresses.

Event context: AirPods 4, Pro updates, and the timeline for Pro features

During a recent Apple event, the company unveiled the new AirPods 4 in two versions, with one variant offering active noise cancellation. This event, while showcasing the broader evolution of the AirPods line, did not herald updates to the AirPods Pro lineup, with insiders indicating that significant Pro-level enhancements would likely arrive in 2025. This context is important because it shapes the perception of how Apple will balance its product families. The AirPods 4 demonstrates Apple’s continued investment in expanding its earbud portfolio and improving core audio quality and convenience features, while the Pro line’s health-oriented upgrades appear to be planned for a later stage.

Industry observers have also noted that a refreshed AirPods Pro 3 could feature a redesigned chassis and an updated chip that would enable health sensors and related software capabilities. While the specifics remain under wraps, expectations are that the new design would support more effective heat management, improved fit across a broad range of ear shapes, and better integration with the Health ecosystem. The chip would play a critical role in processing the sensor data reliably, enabling lower latency and more efficient data handling for real-time workout analytics and seamless HealthKit integration. It is plausible that this chip would be a successor to the current generation’s architecture, designed to balance performance, power efficiency, and thermal performance in compact earbud form factors.

Whether Apple will reveal Powerbeats Pro 2 with built-in health features before AirPods Pro 3 remains an open question. Some sources anticipate a coordinated launch or near-simultaneous reveal in 2025, while others suggest the Powerbeats Pro 2 could precede the Pro 3 to broaden the health-sensor-friendly Beats lineup ahead of AirPods Pro’s more substantial refresh. The actual ordering will depend on engineering milestones, manufacturing readiness, and strategic considerations about how best to present a unified health-oriented strategy across both AirPods and Beats ecosystems. The air surrounding these anticipated releases underscores Apple’s continued focus on health data capture through earbuds, with the potential to unify user experiences across wearables and audio devices.

In summary, the event context reinforces a narrative of gradual, planned advancement rather than a single, sweeping change. Apple appears to be laying the groundwork for a broader health sensor ecosystem that leverages new hardware, software, and privacy features, while continuing to iterate on audio quality and comfort. The combination of a 2025 goal for Pro-level health features, a refreshed AirPods Pro 3 design with an enabling chip, and a parallel Powerbeats Pro 2 line hints at a comprehensive strategy that extends well beyond a single product cycle, signaling a multi-year investment in health-integrated wireless audio.

Industry context: health data, privacy, and the competitive landscape

Apple’s potential move to embed heart-rate sensing into AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2 intersects with a broader, ongoing trend in consumer tech: health data becoming a core feature of mainstream devices. By integrating biometric sensors into earbud hardware, Apple could offer a more continuous and convenient stream of health metrics that complement other wearable devices, increasing the granularity and continuity of fitness data for users who prefer not to wear additional sensors. This approach also leverages the Health ecosystem, which has been a central pillar of Apple’s health strategy for years, reinforcing the company’s position in personal wellness data orchestration across devices.

In this context, privacy becomes a critical differentiator. Apple’s emphasis on user consent, data security, and explicit privacy controls would be essential to gaining consumer trust when health data is collected via earbud sensors. A privacy toggle for heart-rate monitoring, straightforward data controls in Health, and transparent data-sharing policies would align with user expectations and regulatory requirements. The challenge for Apple would be to maintain a balance between providing meaningful health insights from earbud data and ensuring that users retain control over their most sensitive biometric information.

From a competitive standpoint, rivals in the wireless audio space would likely respond with their own health-oriented features. The ability to offer heart-rate data from earbuds could become a differentiating factor in the premium segment, prompting competitors to explore their own sensor technologies and platform integrations. The broader implications for the ecosystem are meaningful: with more devices capable of capturing biometric signals and integrating with Health-derived analytics, developers would have more opportunities to craft holistic wellness experiences that span headphones, wearables, and mobile devices. Apple’s approach, if realized, would set expectations for cross-device data coherence, enabling users to rely on a consistent health narrative across multiple product categories.

The potential adoption of heart-rate sensors in AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2 would also influence how consumers assess the value of health tracking in everyday life. For many users, the idea of gleaning actionable data from earbuds during workouts could simplify monitoring and motivate consistent activity. However, it would also raise questions about data accuracy, sensor reliability during varied activities, and the practical benefits of earbud-based metrics compared with wrist-worn devices or other sensors. Apple would need to address these considerations through rigorous testing, clear messaging about data quality, and a user experience designed to minimize maintenance while maximizing insights.

Another dimension worth considering is how these health features align with broader Apple health initiatives, including fitness coaching, recovery analytics, and personalized wellness recommendations. If heart-rate data from earbuds proves reliable, it could feed into coaching algorithms and training plans that adapt to user performance and physiological responses. The potential for richer, more nuanced workout feedback would enhance the value proposition of Apple’s Health ecosystem, strengthening device loyalty among users who rely on integrated data-driven guidance across their Apple products.

In this environment, Apple’s strategy to roll out health sensors through earbuds would not occur in a vacuum. It would be part of a coordinated push to deepen the Health ecosystem, expand the utility of AirPods and Beats devices, and differentiate Apple’s wellness offerings from those of competitors. The anticipated privacy controls would be central to building consumer confidence in the use of biometric data gathered by wireless audio devices. The likely public reception would hinge on how convincingly Apple demonstrates real-world benefits, how transparent it is about data handling, and how effectively it communicates the value of health metrics captured by earbud sensors in the context of everyday fitness and well-being.

Analyst insights, source reliability, and the communication challenge

The narratives around AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2 stem from a mix of beta-code discoveries, industry rumors, and the track record of sources who have previously provided precise details about other Apple products. The discussion in the tech press highlights a trend toward deeper health integration in wearable devices, supported by credible signals in iOS betas and a history of Apple pursuing health-oriented capabilities across its hardware and software stack. While the evidence from iOS 18 RC is persuasive, it is also inherently speculative at this stage, as beta findings can evolve or be repurposed in later development phases. The credibility of these claims often rests on corroboration from multiple independent sources and the consistency of the design and feature narratives with Apple’s strategic trajectory.

Readers should approach these reports with measured expectations, recognizing that Apple commonly tests features internally before public release, often refining or discarding ideas based on testing outcomes and regulatory constraints. The possibility that the heart-rate sensor will be integrated into the AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2 is credible given the momentum of the Health ecosystem and Apple’s ongoing emphasis on personal wellness data. However, until Apple provides official confirmation or a formal product unveiling, the specifics—such as sensor specifications, data handling details, battery impact, and precise release timing—remain subject to change.

From a communications perspective, Apple’s public messaging around health sensors will be critical. The company would need to clearly articulate how earbud-based heart-rate data complements other health metrics, what users gain from the feature, and how privacy controls function in practice. Clear documentation, accessible privacy settings, and transparent explanations of data flow will be essential in maintaining user trust. The intersection of hardware capability, software integration, and privacy policy will determine not only adoption rates but also the public’s long-term perception of health-tracking in consumer audio devices.

In terms of media coverage, outlets reporting on such developments must maintain a careful balance between highlighting credible signals and avoiding overstatement of confirmed facts. Because the evidence relies on beta references and industry rumors, responsible reporting would emphasize the tentative nature of the claims, the potential implications for the Health ecosystem, and the need for official confirmation from Apple. As the story unfolds, readers should track official announcements, developer documentation updates, and credible demonstrations that provide concrete substantiation of the proposed health features and their integration with HealthKit and iOS.

Health data integration: from earbuds to HealthKit and the broader wellness experience

If the heart-rate sensor integration in AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2 proceeds as rumored, one of the most consequential outcomes would be the seamless incorporation of earbud-derived biometric data into Apple’s HealthKit-based wellness framework. The health data would be expected to flow into Health, where users can view trends, set goals, and understand how their heart rate responds to different activities, environments, and times of day. The integration could unlock richer daily activity insights that complement step counts, workouts tracked by Apple Watch or other devices, and sleep-related metrics. The synergies across devices would reinforce a holistic view of personal wellness, with earbud data serving as a supplementary signal that augments the information captured by wrist-worn devices and other wearables.

A robust integration would require standardized data models across devices, consistent sampling rates, and alignment with HealthKit’s privacy and consent frameworks. It would also necessitate robust data visualization within the Health app to enable users to interpret heart-rate trends in relation to workouts, daily activity, and recovery periods. For developers, the expanded data set would present new opportunities to build experiences around real-time monitoring, training optimization, and personalized coaching. Apps could leverage earbud-derived data to tailor exercise plans, provide feedback on intensity, or generate recovery recommendations based on heart-rate response patterns.

From a user experience perspective, the success of this integration hinges on the clarity of the data presentation and the usefulness of the insights derived from the data. It would be important for Apple to provide straightforward explanations of what heart-rate measurements mean in the context of earbuds, how to interpret any derived metrics, and how to distinguish between signal quality under different conditions (e.g., during vigorous movement versus rapid changes in activity). A well-executed experience would minimize confusion and ensure that users feel informed about how their health data is collected, used, and safeguarded.

In addition to workout-focused capabilities, earbud-based heart-rate data could augment broader wellness analyses, such as stress monitoring, daytime activity patterns, and cardiovascular health screening tools that rely on consistent biometric data over time. If Apple’s approach extends to heart-rate variability and other advanced metrics, users would gain deeper insights into their autonomic nervous system responses, training zones, and overall fitness trajectory. The potential for cross-device analytics could also enable more accurate correlations between heart-rate data and sleep quality, daily energy, or mood, provided that data is collected and presented thoughtfully in a privacy-conscious manner.

The broader wellness ecosystem would be shaped by how third-party developers access and utilize earbud-derived heart-rate data. Apple’s developer guidelines and privacy policies would play a decisive role in determining how such data can be used, shared, and monetized within apps. Clear constraints and robust user controls would be necessary to prevent misuse, ensure data security, and protect user privacy. If implemented carefully, earbud-based heart-rate data could become a key plank in Apple’s strategy to deliver an end-to-end wellness experience that spans software, hardware, and services, reinforcing user engagement with the Health platform and encouraging continued investment in Apple’s ecosystem.

Practical implications: privacy, battery life, and real-world usage

From a practical standpoint, the introduction of a heart-rate sensor in AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2 would require careful attention to several real-world considerations. Battery life is a primary concern for wireless earbuds, and adding continuous heart-rate monitoring could increase power consumption. Apple would likely address this through a combination of hardware efficiency, smarter sensor activation logic, and power-saving software techniques that limit measurements to active periods or certain intervals. The user experience would need to balance the value of ongoing biometric data with the need to preserve battery life for extended listening periods.

Another practical aspect concerns comfort and fit. A health-focused sensor system must maintain accuracy across diverse ear shapes and sizes, even when the user is engaging in strenuous activities. The sensors should be designed to minimize heat buildup, ensure stable contact during movement, and avoid creating pressure points that would undermine comfort during long workouts. Apple would also need to consider the durability of sensors in the slightly more exposed ear canal environment, ensuring that biometric components are protected from moisture and sweat while maintaining a comfortable, secure fit.

The data management side is equally important. With earbud-based heart-rate data entering Health, users would expect reliable data storage, predictable sync behavior with iPhone and iPad, and easy access to historical records. There would likely be safeguards to prevent accidental data loss and to support data export for users who wish to share information with healthcare providers or other wellness apps. Apple would also need to provide a consistent user experience across devices, ensuring that heart-rate data collected from AirPods Pro 3 or Powerbeats Pro 2 is accessible and accurately represented whether the user is on an iPhone, iPad, or Mac.

Security considerations are central to credibility. Health data has sensitive implications, and there would be a strong emphasis on secure data handling, encryption, and restricted access controls. Apple would probably implement end-to-end encryption for data transmitted between earbuds and devices, with local processing where possible to minimize exposure of raw biometric signals. Clear consent prompts, transparent data usage disclosures, and straightforward options to manage, review, and delete health data would be expected components of the user experience. In the event of a data breach or a device compromise, Apple would need robust incident response procedures and user-facing guidance to address concerns promptly.

In terms of user adoption, the health-sensor feature would appeal to a subset of users who actively track workouts and wellness metrics. For most listeners, however, the feature’s value would be determined by how accurately heart-rate readings reflect true physiological states during real-world activities. Apple would benefit from providing validation studies, clear performance expectations, and consistent performance across app ecosystems to establish trust and encourage continued use. If the feature proves reliable, it could become a defining differentiator for AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2, helping Apple maintain leadership in integrated health technology within the consumer electronics space.

The road ahead: testing, validation, and consumer expectations

As Apple moves toward introducing heart-rate sensing in its next generation of wireless earbuds, customers should monitor official communications for details on feature availability, configuration options, and privacy safeguards. The path from beta code to public product requires rigorous testing to ensure sensor accuracy, reliability, and safe operation across diverse use cases. Consumer expectations will hinge on clarity about what is measured, how the data is used, and how users can control their data. Apple’s approach to transparency and user empowerment will play a decisive role in whether earbud-based health sensing becomes a trusted staple in daily wellness routines.

The broader market response will also shape how Apple positions and monetizes these health features. If such capabilities prove compelling, accessories and app developers may prioritize HealthKit-integrated experiences, and retailers could highlight these devices as wellness-enhancing tools in addition to premium audio products. The success of the feature will likely depend on consistent performance, a user-friendly privacy framework, and a clear demonstration of the practical benefits of hearing-based health data for fitness enthusiasts and casual users alike.

Industry watchers will also be attentive to the cadence of future updates following any initial introduction. Apple may release firmware updates that unlock additional metrics, improve sensor stability, or expand the range of supported workouts and health scenarios. Such iterative improvements could help sustain interest in the feature, enabling users to gradually gain more value from earbud-based health data over time. As with any health-related technology, ongoing refinement and responsible communication will be essential to maintain user trust and maximize the positive impact on health and wellness outcomes.

Conclusion

The iOS 18 RC findings provide a concrete glimpse into Apple’s potential next steps for health sensing in wireless earbuds, with heart-rate monitoring positioned as a central feature for AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2. The discovered code hints at a workout-centric data flow to Apple Health, coupled with user controls that would allow privacy-conscious users to disable heart-rate sensing when desired. While still speculative, these signals align with longstanding industry expectations that Apple would expand biometric sensing beyond the Apple Watch and iPhone into its earbud ecosystem, enriching the Health experience with earbud-derived metrics.

Looking ahead to 2025, the anticipated arrivals of AirPods Pro 3 and Powerbeats Pro 2—each potentially equipped with a new health sensor and a refreshed design—suggest a broader strategy to deepen health-data integration across Apple’s audio devices. The AirPods 4 event has demonstrated Apple’s ongoing evolution of its earbud lineup, while signaling that substantial Pro-level updates are likely reserved for a later date. The precise timing and feature scope remain contingent on development progress, regulatory considerations, and official confirmations, but the converging signals point toward a deliberate, phased approach to health-sensor integration that would extend Apple’s Health ecosystem into more everyday devices.

For consumers, the key takeaway is that health-centric features in wireless earbuds could become a standard expectation in Apple’s premium lineup, driven by hardware capabilities, software integration, and robust privacy controls. If these plans materialize, users could gain meaningful new ways to monitor heart-rate during workouts, enrich Health data with earbud-derived metrics, and enjoy a more cohesive wellness experience across Apple devices. As always, official announcements will be the definitive source for confirmation, but the emerging signals suggest that Apple is actively building toward a future where your earbuds play a more central role in personal health and fitness.